Current status
Submitted
Discover more
After a contribution is submitted to BePART Forum, the initiative is marked as “Submitted”; as other partners involved in the initiative submit information from their side, the initiative is marked as “Under review” and goes through the validation process; twice a year, initiatives are validated by the BePART Working Group at the Council of Europe. Successful initiatives are marked as “Validated”. Do you want to learn more – click here
Contributor(s)
First contributor: Boryslav City Park
Summary
“Under the open sky” is a successful winner project within the All-Ukrainian national Public Budget (PB) (the first project implemented in Lviv region within the national PB), that attracted more than 3,000 people in voting for the project, that was more than 30% of all votes among 17 projects taking part in that project competition. As a result of the successful campaign, the project won in 2020 and was successfully implemented.
Administrative level
Local
Year of implementation
2021
Policy area(s)
- Local Development and Planning
- Education, culture, and sport
- Youth
- Environment
- Public Health
Further details
/
Sorry, no records were found. Please adjust your search criteria and try again.
Sorry, unable to load the Maps API.
Civil society organisation
Contact info
/
Tipology of involvement in the initiative
- Initiating (i.e., advocating for and starting the process)
- Participating with a direct involvement
Lviv Regional State Administration
Public Authority
Contact info
/
Tipology of involvement in the initiative
- Initiating (i.e., advocating for and starting the process)
- Organising
- Funding
- Indirectly impacted by the process
Boryslav city council
Public Authority
Contact info
/
Tipology of involvement in the initiative
- Funding
- Participating with a direct involvement
- Indirectly impacted by the process
Boryslav city park
Public Authority
Contact info
/
Tipology of involvement in the initiative
- Initiating (i.e., advocating for and starting the process)
- Organising
- Participating with a direct involvement
- Indirectly impacted by the process
Level of Participation
- Partnership
Discover more
By level of participation we refer to the type of involvement in the decision-making process. The levels are identified by the intensity of participation: going from “information” to “consultation” to ” dialogue” to “partnership”. Do you want to learn more – click here
Developed practice(s)
The idea of the project was designed in close cooperation between Boryslav city park administration, Boryslav city council and civil society (CSO’s, volunteers, entrepreneurs etc.) as each of them played equally efficient role in the common success of the initiative. Only in partnership there was a chance to involve within the voting process more than 3,000 people, to co-finance the project from city budget and to implement the initiative in very short terms. The partnership was also based on interaction of public authorities (as the organisers of the contest of the All-Ukrainian national PB)  and Boryslav City Park (as participant) and the organisation implementing the winner project.
Step(s) of the political decision-making process at which the practice was implemented
- Inputs/Incentive ideas for policy
- Decision – making on policy
- Implementation of policy
- Monitoring of policy implementation
Discover more
There are six different steps of the political decision-making process: agenda setting, drafting of policy, decision-making, implementation of policy, monitoring and reformulation of policy. Each step offer opportunities for CSOs and public authorities to interact. Do you want to learn more – click here
How the initiative was implemented
Situation
The All-Ukrainian Public Budget (PB) is an innovative program that was implemented in 2020 in Lviv region for the first time. It is a tool which allows the participation of citizens of Lviv region (aged 18 and older), influencing the distribution of state funding by submitting projects and conducting open public voting for selected projects.
At the beginning, almost no one believed in the project. Boryslav’s City Council signed a memorandum of cooperation with Drohobych and Truskavets’ city councils and submitted a joint project for the All-Ukrainian Public Budget that involved the purchase of three electric vehicles for tourism development. The project became an example of community gathering. We managed to develop an effective action plan and following it step by step, we designed the logo of the project and printing products that were spread all over the city. Our groups of volunteers were on duty at the ATMs and bank offices day after day, involving local residents in the voting. The specialists of the administrative service center served primarily the lined up groups of people occupying almost the entire area of the square in front of the city council building. Most residents did not believe that it was possible to win just like that. But the project was supported by more than 3,000 Lviv residents, and it won. When the residents came to the grand opening of the rope park, they felt the real involvement to the implementation of the project. People had seen that change could be made without great financial expense on their part but only due to their active participation in the decision-making.
Activities performed
- Participation in the training for project authors and applicants provided by the organisers.
- Consideration of ideas by the Working Group for the implementation of the All-Ukrainian Public Budget in the Lviv region, during which the authors could receive a draft for editing.
- Registration of the project on the e-dem platform.
- Establishment of a project team of at least 20 people from different organisations representing civil society, local authorities and business with a clear division of responsibilities and tasks.
- Development of an action plan and mechanisms for its implementation.
- Providing voting and advertising campaign to obtain the highest number of votes and 30% of the total number of votes.
- Ensuring public participation at all stages of the project through a broad information and promotion campaign.
- Identification and approval of winners by the Regional Commission.
- Implementation of the project by the end of 2020.
- Realization of the idea and a sense of belonging to the changes in the community of all those who took part in the project.
Tools and mechanisms applied
- Production and distribution of leaflets and posters with information about the project and voting conditions in the city in public transport, park, streets, crowded places (supermarkets, bus stops, market, city council, social services…), near Privat24 ATMs.
- Publications of internet resources and social networks: websites, Facebook pages and groups, personal profiles of the participants of the initiative group, bloggers and those who support the project.
- Publications in local and regional media resources: “Warto-Galician News” portal, Zik, “First Western”, “Slovo” radio etc.
- Information and promotion campaign according to which messages were created and distributed for each target audience through its communication channel (printing, media, stories, QR codes, posters, mobile applications such as viber, messenger, telegram, whatsapp, etc.).
- Group and self-to-self meetings with the citizens, discussions, email newsletter. Brainstorming to stimulate new ideas for involving people into the voting process.
- Engaging the organised groups of students to vote in the administrative service center and also, we managed to organise a group of volunteers standing by the ATMs and consulting people on how to vote for the project for the whole 10-days of voting period.
Goals of the civil participation initiative
At community level
The main goal of the civil participation at “community” level was to vote for the project and to promote the vote in Lviv region among friends and relatives. Due to active civil participation, the initiative gained 3,112 votes (more than 30% of the total) and it won the contest.
The practice had a positive effect on the development of the civic environment, strengthened the belief that changemaking is possible, every voice of each citizen is of high value, can influence and define the result of the contest. The initiative promoted further systemic development of the community, it formed a team of change-makers, around whom the community is now gathering.
From Civil society organisation’s perspective
The CSOs were the channels of communication between the first group and the citizens, providing a wide information and advertising campaign. They also helped organising different groups of volunteers for the action plan to be realised. Thanks to their participation, the trust to the initiative was high and citizens took an active part in the initiative.
From Public Authority’s Perspective
The PAs helped with the organization of the voting process in the administrative service center and co-financed the project according to the project application requirements.
Results expected prior to the implementation
The prior expectations for all the participants of the initiative were quite different. Lviv Regional State Administration, as contest organiser, desired to get well written applications, good, motivated initiative groups, active participation of the citizens of Lviv region in voting process. Â For Boryslav City Council it was very important to receive additional financing for the initiative and projects implemented in the city’s territory and a status of the winner of the first All-Ukrainian Participatory Budgeting in Lviv region. The initiative group expected to get the most votes and to attract as many people as possible to participate into the participatory process. The citizens wanted to support the project by voting, to win the contest and the project to be realized.
Immediate results achieved after implementation
The 0.92 ha of the recreational zone in Boryslav Park for the rope park had been put in order (old emergency trees were cut down and uprooted, the territory was leveled and sown with grass), 1 rope park (perimeter 438.75 m) with three independent routes of different levels of difficulty was equipped and 1 set of professional equipment (computer, projector, screen, speaker system) for the organization of open-air film screenings in Boryslav Park was purchased.
Long-term impact
The implementation of the project “Under the open sky” and participation in first All-Ukrainian Participatory Budgeting in Lviv region has had a positive impact on the further development of other initiatives, inspiring and motivating the citizens to actively participate in grant competitions and programs that attract various resources. Therefore, in 2021, Boryslav City Park applied for a new contest winning with the project “Arrangement of the open-air cinema in Boryslav city park” and a multifunctional space for people of different ages and social categories was created. From the activities of the rope park in 2021 provided additional financing for new initiatives, one of which was the renovation of the “Green Theater” (concert venue with stage), which hadn’t been used for more than 20 years and shows movies, concerts, discos, charity events (charity concert in support of victims of road accidents, etc.), fairs and other cultural, educational and entertainment events were held there. In August 2021, we began to develop the Strategy of Boryslav City Park with the methodological and expert support of the Council of Europe project “Strengthening Public Participation in the Democratic Decision-Making Process in Ukraine”. The initiative group also submitted and won the application for the creation of the first public space in Boryslav community “Community Development Center”, which includes the arrangement of youth space and tourist information center, which had not existed until that time. Thus, the initiative provided a real opportunity to activate the community for a common goal, to learn a lot of interesting and useful things about regional policy, budgets and interaction with public authorities.
Practice lessons learnt (obstacles and solutions)
Agency (i.e., political conditions/power structures) | Obstacles | To win the vote you need to get the most votes and this number must be more than 30% of the total. That is extremely problematic with many projects (17 projects took part in the voting), because even a few votes per each project increases the total number of votes by tens. |
Solutions | To reduce the barrier to 5% or provide rating evaluation of projects by the number of votes received. | |
Legislative | Obstacles | The evaluation of projects through the procedure of the State Fund for Regional Development. The idea of ​​the All-Ukrainian public budget is that citizens play a crucial role in the selection of projects. The State Fund for Regional Development procedure provides for a slightly different approach: the final decision is made by a regional commission that may delay the process of determining the winner by not including the issue on the agenda. In addition, State Fund for Regional Development funds are usually development budget funds, capital expenditures. This limits the projects that contain not only the capital construction component, but also, for example, consumption expenditures: training, purchase of software, equipment, etc. |
Solutions | The All-Ukrainian Participatory Budgeting should follow a separate procedure and preferably a separate budget item with a separate procedure for funding and mandatory increase the percentage of public participation in the selection and evaluation of projects. | |
Administrative | Obstacles | Changing application forms and the roles of initiator of the project. The application for participation in the All-Ukrainian Participatory Budgeting competition was prepared according to the model established by the Regulation on the All-Ukrainian Participatory Budgeting in Lviv region. Therefore, the initiator of the project may be a citizen of Ukraine over 18 years of age living in the Lviv region, local authorities, research institutions and public organizations operating within the Lviv region. But for the project to be approved and financed, the application must be submitted in the form required by the State Fund for Regional Development by the local authorities. |
Solutions | The All-Ukrainian Participatory Budgeting should follow a separate procedure and preferably a separate budget item with a separate procedure for funding and mandatory increase in the percentage of public participation in the selection and evaluation of projects. | |
Socio-cultural | Obstacles | Complicated voting procedure for the project which is carried out in the electronic system by authorizing a person with an electronic signature or through ID-bank. Older people refused to vote for fear of using their personal data for other purposes, each bank had its own authorisation procedure, not all payment cards could be easily used to log in to the platform. |
Solutions | To provide special informational campaigns for elderly people and low-mobility categories of the population on online-services and digital tools. | |
Economic | Obstacles | Restrictions in the minimum estimated cost of the project. |
Solutions | Abolishing this requirement would allow more projects to be implemented within the allocated funds. Currently, construction projects must cost at least 5 million hryvnias, and other initiatives – at least 1 million. | |
Human capital | Obstacles | The lack of a single software solution that would allow projects to be selected with the participation of citizens. |
Solutions | Introduction of a single digital platform for the selection of the All-Ukrainian Participatory Budgeting projects. This can be implemented after the creation of a separate article in the Budget Code. | |
Other | Obstacles | / |
Solutions | / |
Further information
/
Self-assessment
The self-assessment presents the opinion of the contributor about on what extent the following principles for Civil Participation have been reflected in the implementation of the initiative/practice/case-study, ranging from 1 (min) to 4 (max) (N/A: not applicable, do not know)
Openness | 4 |
 Explanation | Plain and clear conditions for participation in the competition, training, and consultative support from the organisers of the competition gave the opportunity to register the project to anyone who lives in Lviv region and is 18+. |
Trust | 4 |
  Explanation | The implementation of the All-Ukrainian Public Budget was carried out in accordance with the principles that clearly define the conditions of the competition, the obligations, and rights of each participant in the process. |
Independence | 4 |
  Explanation | Every initiative group was independent to use any effective and efficient tool and mechanism for involving the people into voting for the project within the current legislation. |
Participation | 4 |
  Explanation | The initiative established interaction between citizens, local and central government. The All-Ukrainian Public Budget is a national tool for involving citizens in the distribution of the state budget by submitting relevant projects, determining the priority through electronic voting. The financing and monitoring of the implementation of winning projects are under the State Fund for Regional Development. The local authorities co-finance the project from the local budgets at least 10% of the project budget. The residents join and can communicate with the entire vertical of government – not only at the local level, but also at the regional and state level. |
Transparency | 4 |
  Explanation | Electronic voting and accounting system ensured transparency of the process. |
Accessibility | 3 |
  Explanation | We developed a communication plan for an information and promotion campaign according to which messages were created and distributed for each target audience through its communication channel (printing, media, stories, QR codes, pictures, mobile networks, and apps viber, messenger, telegram, whatsapp, etc.). |
Non-discrimination | 3 |
  Explanation | Every person aged 18+ who was living in Lviv region could apply and vote for the desired project on the e-dem platform of the All-Ukrainian Public Budget or personally in the administrative service center. |
Inclusiveness | 4 |
  Explanation | Electronic voting and accounting system allowed every person aged 18+ who was living in Lviv region to participate in the initiative and to be heard. |
Accountability | 4 |
   Explanation | All the stages of project implementation were documented and made available to the public on the e-dem platform of the All-Ukrainian Public Budget and on the public procurement platform Prozorro. |
Thank you for wanting to share your experience on the BePART platform!
Learn more about the submission process, or just fill the form below.